Controversy surrounds the Austin Police Department's criminal and internal investigation into the shooting death of Nathaniel Sanders on May 11, 2009 by former Austin police officer Leonardo Quintana.
Quintana and fellow officers were out on patrol, looking for suspects in an unrelated robbery and were investigating the vehicle Sanders was in as being 'suspicious.'
A grand jury decided not to indict Quintana. He was, however, later fired over a drunken driving charge he received in January in Leander.
View raw footage from one of the officer's Dashboard cameras by clicking here.
After a slew of internal and external reports and reviews on the shooting, the KeyPoint report continues to spark controversy about the events of that day.
In early July, city officials announced they had reached a tentative settlement with the Sanders family. The announcement left city officials, community leaders and many more pondering whether it is the right move for both parties.
You can review the case in its entirety through the links provided below: Major events and developments, How officials responded, Community reaction and Analysis.

News Report: 07/20/2010 -- Martinez: Sanders settlement leaves too much unanswered
News Report: 07/09/2010 – City reaches tentative settlement with Sanders family
News Report: 06/27/2010 -- Judge dismisses Sanders’ family wrongful death lawsuit
The KeyPoint Report
News Report: 05/28/2010 -- City Council questions KeyPoint redactions
News Report: 5/26/2010--Activists get no response from city manager on Sanders case
Document: KeyPoint report containing Acevedo's former colleague's handwritten notes
News Report: 5/26/2010--Handwritten notes reveal new details in Sanders report
News Report: 5/25/2010--Handling of officer-involved shooting questioned
News Report: 5/24/2010--Mayor still uncertain about why full report wasn't released
News Report: 5/22/2010--APD Chief, community leaders talk race relations in Austin
News Report: 5/21/2010--Ott outlines decision-making process on KeyPoint report
Document: Memo from Ott to Mayor Leffingwell
News Report: 5/21/2010--Group voices distrust in APD, calls for Acevedo's removal
News Report: 5/20/2010--Mayor, city council react to investigation fallout
News Report: 5/19/2010--City attorney retires in wake of full release of KeyPoint report
Document: Redacted KeyPoint Report
Document: Unredacted KeyPoint Report
News Report: 5/11/2010--As details of Sanders’ report leaked, controversy continues
News Report: 5/11/2010--Attorney calls APD’s Sanders’ investigation a cover-up
News Report: 5/08/2010--Full Report of Sanders’ shooting states ‘Actions were reckless’
Leonardo Quintana
News Report: 5/06/2010--
APD fires officer involved in controversial shooting for DWINews Report: 5/03/2010--APD officer Quintana faces disciplinary hearing for DWI
News Report: 4/27/2010--Acevedo testifies in lawsuit against City of Austin
News Report: 01/13/2010--Leander police arrest APD officer Quintana for DWI
News Report: 11/04/2009--Austin police chief gives Quintana 15-day suspension
News Report: 08/18/2009--Future still unknown for APD's Quintana
News Report: 08/12/2009--Panel set to review Sanders Quintana case
News Report: 08/05/2009--Grand Jury decides not to indict APD officer
Document: District Attorney’s Statement (after Quintana no-billed)
News Report: 08/05/2009--Quintana no billed in Sanders Shooting
Chris Dunn
News Report: 06/29/2010 --
Arbitrator upholds APD firing over Sanders emailNews Report: 04/14/2010--Arbitration continues for detective fired in Sanders’ shooting
News Report: 04/13/2010--Appeal proceedings underway for officer fired over email
Document: Dunn Letter of Appeal
News Report: 11/06/2009--Police officer fired in Sanders’ investigation files appeal
News Report: 11/05/2009--Acevedo fired internal affairs officer after Sanders report
Texas Civil Rights Project
News Report: 05/27/2010--
Texas Civil Rights Project alleges Acevedo broke the lawDocument: KeyPoint Report containing Acevedo’s former colleague Lt. Paul Golonski's notes
News Report: 04/09/2010--Organization suing city for full Nathaniel Sanders shooting report
News Report: 11/19/2009--City of Austin approves changes to APD internal affairs
News Report: 10/05/2009--Report calls APD internal affairs investigation biased
Other major events and developments
News Report: 09/10/2009--APD officers suspended over dashboard cameras
News Report: 08/19/2009--Independent investigation ordered in shooting death of Sanders
News Report: 06/04/2009--Man charged with making terroristic threats adds another charge
News Report: 06/02/2009--Parents of Nathaniel Sanders file federal lawsuit
News Report: 05/18/2009--Sanders' family and friends mourn, APD investigation continues
News Report: 05/15/2009--APD says gang out to kill officers
News Report: 05/14/2009--APD officer involved shooting recorded on dash cam
News Report: 05/12/2009--Arrests made during officer involved shooting
News Report: 05/11/2009--Officer-involved shooting press conference sheds new light
News Report: 5/11/2009--2 shot, 1 dead in officer involved shooting
Back to the top | Community Reaction | Analysis

News Report: 07/20/2010 --Pending vote on Sanders settlement has officials wary
News Report: 07/20/2010 -- Martinez: Sanders settlement leaves too much unanswered
News Report: 07/13/2010 -- Austin police union disapproves of pending settlement
News Report: 06/24/2010 -- City council approves vote on term limits for city attorney
News Report: 06/21/2010 --Acevedo talks public safety, Sanders shooting at forum
News Report: 5/24/2010--Mayor still uncertain about why full report wasn't released
News Report: 05/21/2010--Mayor, city council react to investigation fallout
News Report: 04/27/2010--Acevedo testifies in lawsuit against City of Austin
News Report: 11/19/2009--City of Austin approves changes to APD internal affairs
News Report: 11/09/2009--APD hopes new dash cams help restore community trust
News Report: 11/06/2009--Acevedo, ‘We’ve all lost’ in Sanders case
News Report: 11/04/2009--Austin police chief gives Quintana 15-day suspension
News Report: 10/06/2009--Police Chief responds to report critical of APD investigation
News Report: 09/10/2009--APD officers suspended over dashboard cameras
News Report: 08/19/2009--Independent investigation ordered in shooting death of Sanders
News Report: 08/18/2009--APD police monitor to present findings in Sanders shooting
News Report: 08/06/2009--Quintana no billed in Sanders Shooting
News Report: 08/05/2009--Grand Jury decides not to indict APD officer
Document: Grand Jury Investigation
News Report: 06/02/2009--East Austin community meeting sheds light on divide
The following is Sheryl Cole's response to the Grand Jury's decision not to indict Leonardo Quintana in the shooting death of Nathaniel Sanders.
As I have said before, my sincere condolences to the family of Nathaniel Sanders and my thoughts and prayers are with his family and friends. Today the Travis County grand jury chose not to indict the officer involved in his death. I am asking the Police Department and the community to continue their ongoing efforts in community policing.
We are still awaiting the report of the internal investigation from Austin Police Chief Acevedo. This report will be sent to the Police Monitor and the Citizen Review Panel before any definitive action is taken.
I ask that we continue to be prayerful for Nathaniel Sanders' family and the law enforcement family involved in this incident.
The following is Police Chief Art Acevedo's response to the Austin American Statesman article printed May 8, 2010. According to the article, an independent review of the incident said Officer Quintana's actions leading up to the shooting were so reckless that they may have been criminal.
The process of investigating Senior Police Officer Leonardo Quintana’s use-of-force incident included thorough administrative, criminal and Grand-Jury Investigations. The evidence from the administrative and KeyPoint investigations was reviewed by the Citizens’ Review Panel (CRP), which is comprised of a diverse group of Austin residents, and the Office of Police Monitor (OPM). The administrative, CRP and OPM reviews of the facts and evidence into this matter all determined that Officer Quintana’s use of deadly force was objectively reasonable and within Austin Police Department policy. Moreover, the Travis County Grand-Jury also determined that Officer Quintana’s use of deadly force was lawful. The Austin Police Department stands by the findings of the administrative, CRP, OPM and grand-jury processes. The Department is precluded by Texas State Law and a standing Federal Court protective order from commenting further on the KeyPoint Report.
The following is Police Chief Art Acevedo's response to the Austin American Statesman article printed May 8, 2010. According to the article, an independent review of the incident said Officer Quintana's actions leading up to the shooting were so reckless that they may have been criminal.
The Austin City Council was advised by the City Attorney several months ago that the unredacted version of the KeyPoint report was not legally available to the Council for review. As such, the Council remained unaware of the full details until they were reported in the media. Like everyone, I’m troubled by the findings of the report, and intend to review the matter fully with the City Manager and Police Chief.
The following is Mayor Lee Leffingwell's response to city attorney David Allan Smith's resignation.
I was informed of David's decision by the City Manager late this afternoon. David has served the City of Austin capably for many years. I respect his service to our community, and I wish him all the best.
Back to the top | Major Events and Developments | Analysis

News Report: 07/13/2010 -- Austin police union disapproves of pending settlement
Document: Wayne Vincent's letter of disapproval with Sanders family settlement offer
News Report: 05/27/2010--Texas Civil Rights Project alleges Acevedo broke the law
Document: KeyPoint Report containing Acevedo’s former colleague Lt. Paul Golonski's notes
News Report: 5/26/2010--Activists get no response from city manager on Sanders case
News Report: 5/25/2010--Handling of officer-involved shooting questioned
News Report: 05/21/2010--Group voices distrust in APD, calls for Acevedo's removal
News Report: 05/15/2010--Community leaders criticizes APD, city officials in wake of KeyPoint response
News Report: 05/11/2010--Attorney calls APD’s Sanders’ investigation a cover-up
News Report: 04/09/2010--Organization suing city for full Nathaniel Sanders shooting report
News Report: 03/09/2010--Community groups react to Acevedo’s possible departure
News Report: 11/17/2009--NAACP wants more oversight in officer involved shootings
News Report: 08/24/2009--Local NAACP criticizes city's handling of Sanders shooting
News Report: 08/18/2009--Future still unknown for APD's Quintana
News Report: 06/02/2009--East Austin community meeting sheds light on divide
News Report: 05/31/2009--NAACP encourages grieving community to stay involved
News Report: 05/29/2009--NAACP hosts meeting following officer-involved shooting
News Report: 05/26/2009--Austin NAACP president urges community to be patient
News Report: 05/25/2009--NAACP meeting to focus on shooting and community
News Report: 05/18/2009--Sanders' family and friends mourn, APD investigation continues
News Report: 05/13/2009--Community continues to question as APD investigates
News Report: 05/12/2009--Neighbors react to officer involved shooting
The following is the ACLU's response to the Grand Jury's decision not to indict Leonardo Quintana in the shooting death of Nathaniel Sanders.
As expected, the grand jury "failed to find a bill of indictment against" Officer Quintana in the shooting of Nathaniel Sanders II. Historically, Travis County grand jurors fail to indict because they are often not provided enough evidence to do so without a doubt. In this case, the absence of video footage of the shooting incident itself certainly factors in. Audio and witness statements doubtfully paint a clear enough picture of the critical moments leading up to Quintana shooting at Sanders. Video footage did not capture those critical moments, and whether Internal Affairs rules not turning on the two videocameras or whether actions leading up to the shooting were in violation of policy remains to be seen. From our perspective, not turning on cameras at any detainment, where arrest -or worse- is a possibility, is a clear violation.
Our thoughts are with the Sanders family today and with the eastside community in general, as this ruling likely represents to them one more detrimental notch in relations between it and APD.
The following is Jim Harrington's response to city attorney David Allan Smith's resignation.
The forced resignation of David Smith in light of the KeyPoint fiasco and resulting loss of confidence in the police and city leaders is a step forward. He has long substituted his own personal political judgment for sound legal advice to the city’s leaders so that they can make appropriate decisions. We have been warning city council about this for a good while.
His role in the KeyPoint cover up is the final straw. It was shameful we had to file suit to vindicate the citizens’ right to see the report. There was no legal basis for the city to hide the report. He, however, should not be made a scapegoat about the KeyPoint mess. There is plenty of serious and substantial blame to go around. This should be only the first of a series of corrective measures.
Family Activism
News Report: 07/09/2010 –
City reaches tentative settlement with Sanders familyNews Report: 06/27/2010 -- Judge dismisses Sanders’ family wrongful death lawsuit
News Report: 08/06/2009--Sanders family wants feds to review case
News Report: 06/27/2009--NAACP hosts community gathering at walnut creek
News Report: 06/02/2009--Parents of Nathaniel Sanders file federal lawsuit
Back to the top | Major Events and Developments | Official Response

Raw Video: Dashcam video of the incident
Document: Redacted KeyPoint Report
Document: Unredacted KeyPoint Report
News Report: 5/12/2010--Keypoint’s not a small fish when it comes to investigations
News Report:10/5/2009-- Report calls APD internal affairs investigation biased
News Report: 6/2/2009--East Austin community meeting sheds light on divide
Document: Diagram of Cars From DA’s Office
News Report: 5/12/2009--Deciphering APD dashboard cameras
Document: Nathaniel Sanders Toxicology Report
• Sophia King, a black woman with a history of mental illness was shot and killed by an APD officer in June 2002 as she was running towards an East Austin housing project manager wielding a knife. The officer was hailed for saving the life of the housing manager. But testimony in court cast aspersions on the police for not properly dealing with a woman they must have known was mentally ill. The case raised awareness in how officers are trained to deal with people with mental illness.
• Jesse Lee Owens, a black man, was shot and killed by an APD officer in June 2003. Officer Scott Glasgow was later indicted by a Travis County grand jury, but the indictment was quashed by a state district judge for lack of evidence. Glasgow was eventually reinstated to the police department, but in a non-patrol role.
• Daniel Rocha, a Hispanic man, was shot in the back at close range by Officer Julie Schroeder in June 2005. Schroeder was later fired for failing to following correct police procedure. But a Travis County grand jury declined to indict her in the case.
• Kevin Brown, a black man, was shot several times and killed by Officer Michael Olsen in June 2007. Olsen was fired from the police force and that firing was upheld by a civil service commission.
Each of the officers involved in these four shootings was white.
Back to the top | Major Events and Developments | Official Response | Community Reaction